|
Screenshot Weblogged by Amanda Portal |
![]() |
Get notified when I post;
My
other sites:
comments by YACCS |
|
10.25.2002 |
We Won! Cornell graduate students voted down the
proposed CASE/UAW union in a landslide of 1351 against to 580 for! Wooooo!
If you're interested in the history of the anti-CASE/UAW effort, check
out our website at
AtWhatCost.org. I've been spending
basically every waking hour on this for the past several weeks (and many
hours that should not have been waking...) so I'm thrilled. I got to be
at the vote itself and watch them count the ballots. It was the closest
I've been to a democratic process in person, and it was thrilling.
I'll talk about this more in the next few days I'm sure, but for now I
just want to give my thanks and love to Allen, Anne, David, John, and
Mariajose. We did it, guys!
|
We won! | ||
|
9.29.2002 |
To wrap up Banned Books Week, I just thought I'd
point out some of the excellent works which ended up on the list of
the 100
most frequently challenged books of 1999-2000, the most recent
list I've seen published:
|
reading: The History of Lace; Mrs. Bury Palliser |
||
|
9.24.2002 |
I'm not sure anyone can disagree that there
is over-hype
of AI by pundits who claim it's the next technological
magic bullet, particularly those who subtitle their books
When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. However,
any article which starts its argument with "First, AI is a
technological backwater." needs to seriously look at what
definition of "AI" they are using, and if they are limiting themselves
to only the "building mechanical people" definition, they need to
be slapped around. And then shown the ongoing research in and
applications of learning, and machine vision, and planning. And
then slapped around some more. Oh sure, the article later
concedes that there is "narrow" and "generalized" AI, but the former
is so quickly dismissed as to suggest it has narrowed itself
beyond even deserving the label AI. Of course, anyone whose
best slam against
Kurzweil's
Ramona is: "Ramona uses natural language processing, a technology that's been around for decades, although Mr. Kurzweil claims to have improved it." doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
[via RRE]
Schools certainly have to choose books with an awareness of not offending or traumatizing students, particularly when dealing with young children. Banning Shakespeare, or requiring permission slips from parents, particularly when talking about high school seniors is absurd. Almost as absurd as calling Twelfth Night "alternative lifestyle instruction". MACBETH
|
reading: Persuasion; Jane Austen
knitting:
premier watching: |
||
|
9.23.2002 |
To celebrate National Banned Books week, I'll be
featuring a different banned book each dady I remember to update.
My favorite banned books site is the
Online
Books Page Banned Books Online site, though
ALA has a nice one too.
I'll start off with Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, banned at one time
by South Africa's apartheid regime and required reading this year for
incoming Cornell freshmen. Of course, everyone here remembers that Frankenstein
is the scientist, not the monster...
By one of those caprices of the mind which we are perhaps most subject to in early youth, I at once gave up my former occupations, set down natural history and all its progeny as a deformed and abortive creation, and entertained the greatest disdain for a would be science which could never even step within the threshold of real knowledge. In this mood of mind I betook myself to the mathematics and the branches of study appertaining to that science as being built upon secure foundations, and so worthy of my consideration.
|
attending:
reading: |
||
|
9.19.2002 |
It's been a working-vacation here, with
traveling and writing and keeping up on the
fight against graduate
student unionization and many other stresses. For
those who know why I was out of town - things have gone
great. As an upshot, I actually spent two entire weeks
without doing a spot of websurfing and I didn't even miss
it. This is doing great things for my productivity. And over
a week of 7AM mornings has totally reset my sleep
schedule. I've come back a whole new me. Unfortunately
for you, it's a me that wants to get work done,
but I'm sure that won't last long. And of course, through
cleaning out my inbox I've come across a couple of items
worth mentioning...
They're letting just anyone into our orbit now,
it seems. Astronomers last week
found
a new Earth moon, though they haven't determined if
it's rock or space-junk coming home to roost. Either way, it's
got a 50-day orbit around us. I didn't even know, as the
article mentions at the end, that we've already got a natural
satellite besides the moon - Cruithne. There's a very nice
information
page on Cruithne out of the Queen's University
Astronomy Research Group.
[via Skunkfuckers]
As I mentioned above the group I helped
kick off is working its collective asses off on getting the word out
on
why Cornell graduate
students shouldn't unionize under CASE/UAW. In the
latest fun news, the graduate student government, who have
passed a resolution of neutrality on the issue, are planning on
hosting a website at which a "static debate" on the issue can
be displayed. Each side will get a chance to write in answers
to student-submitted questions, and also briefly rebut the
other side's answers. Sounds great - a one-stop information
clearinghouse for people who don't have the time to search
through multiple sites. Problem? The proposal designates
the administration as the official anti-unionization group. Yet
another attempt to make this "students vs. administration"
and push under the rug the growing number of students who
oppose unionization. I'd be less cynical about their motives,
but the currrent president of the graduate student assembly
was elected president while concurrently being paid as a
UAW organizer, though of course that was not disclosed
to the voters, and many other members are also active in
the unionization effort. Excuse me if I am slightly skeptical
of the grand neutrality of the group's leadership.
|
reading: |
||
|
8.27.2002 |
As a whole separate can of worms for the unionization
debate, it seems that even students that want a union are trying to
get as far away from UAW representation as possible, though they aren't
necessarily succeeding. I knew that UMass Amherst had had their union made
into an administratorship, but I only learned last night that
at UCSB
graduate students aren't being represented in negotiations for their own
contracts, though they are being asked to strike.
A whole separate, independent union,
United Student Labor, has been set up, but the UAW is saying that legally they are the only
group permitted to bargain with the university. Things sound very bad:
The UAW is calling for a strike authorization vote because UAW contract negotiations with the UC have failed to produce a contract. However, the people that the contract negotiations and the related strike authorization vote will affect most--that is, UCSB graduate students like you and me--have not had any input into this strategy. As many of you already know, we no longer have any elected representatives on the UAW bargaining team and, since November, the UAW has not even allowed us to observe the local negotiations here at UCSB. Furthermore, the UAW staff have refused to provide any substantive information on the proceedings of the negotiations (e.g. to GSA President Grace Credo). And despite our repeated objections, the UAW has so far ignored our insistence that important contract items such as our right to strike, our protection from discrimination, and a variety of other important topics not be negotiated away without our informed consent.While the original union representatives did resign, due to conflict with the UAW, it is outrageous that new representatives were not recognized. This belies any claims that the UAW will leave graduate student issues up to the graduate students, and are only involved as a provider of money and legal resources. The UAW will have the legal right to step in, and it has shown itself willing to.
I once heard a union activist say "I'd rather have other graduate students
determining my contract than the administration." Well, I'd rather have
my contract in the hands of Cornell than the UAW.
|
reading: |
||
|
8.26.2002 |
The Cornell Daily Sun had a sadly one-sided,
and occassionally incorrect
article on unionization in its first edition of the semester, including
the false title
Graduate Students
To Elect Union Reps; we only elect representatives if we first vote
to form a union. Of course, the article ignores that there might be any
graduate student opposition, simplifying the situation to one of a fight
between graduate students and the administration. I suppose, with that
view of the world, it is a reasonable jump from Cornell's agreement not
to appeal the election, but hopefully the vote isn't as sure as all that.
Certainly, anecdotal evidence suggests that students signed cards either
not understanding that they implied support for the union or in order to
get union activists out of their hair.
Also interesting in the article: Facing similar student unionization movements, Columbia and Brown universities appealed the NYU case and are currently awaiting a decision from the full NLRB.So, part of the motivation for a quick union vote is to push a union through before the NLRB decides we aren't actually eligible for unionization. This makes Cornell's concessions even more surprising and conciliatory.
And, because I'm hoping to push some Google points its way, I'll mention
again that
'At What Cost?' is reaching out to
graduate students concerned about unionization at Cornell.
|
reading: |
||
|
8.25.2002 |
My weblogging time over the past couple of days has
been taken up with a real-life project, but at least it's one with a web
presence. At What Cost? is a
group of graduate students who are concerned about the current
unionization process taking place at Cornell. You can go there to read
about some of the concerns the group has; we've tried to put together a
comprehensive and consise list. I'm very interested to see what
kind of response it draws, if any. Right now, there's no way to tell
how much support the union has. At the least, I hope the site forces
the union people to answer some concrete questions they've been avoiding.
Next time I find a piece of free time, though,
I'll probably use it to play with
The Google Quiz.
Play with Google, win Google swag. What could be better?
[via Anita's LOL]
With minimal artistic license, a snippet of this evening's conversation: Guy on TV, to skinny girl: You're a stick figure!
|
reading: |
||
| Previous Entries |
|
These pages are Copyright 1999 -2002. Do not copy or redistribute any of the content on these pages without express permission. Direct any questions to maxsroom@gmail.com.