|
Screenshot Weblogged by Amanda Portal My
other sites: |
![]() |
Get notified when I post; |
|
6.15.2002 |
A timely web resource for me, I just found the
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National
Image Library.
A couple of sample searches show that it does pretty well on animal and plant
names, but poorly on locations. The images are all in the public domain, though,
and the images that are included are usually quite good. Since I'm spending
the weekend playing with my new copy of Photoshop 7, I'll probably be dipping
in here for images to play with.
[via BookPeople]
I was pleased to discover that even crappy
faux-pad thai made out of what you happen to have on hand can be pretty
good. I broke fettucini noodles into short pieces, substituted lime juice
for tamarind, assumed oyster sauce and fish sauce can't be that different,
and passed on the shallots and scallions entirely, but in very little more
time than just boiling the pasta takes I got something that tasted in the right
ballpark and satisfied my craving for an interesting lunch without having
to leave the house. I wish I'd known years ago how easy it would be to make.
I might even try going to buy the correct ingredients some time!
|
reading: The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie; Muriel Spark Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies; Douglas Hofstadter |
||
|
6.14.2002 |
When sensitivity goes overboard: this is an extreme degree of
sanitizing
of literary passages in the NY Regents exams [NYTimes
registration required].
There is a line between choosing not to use offensive texts and butchering texts,
without the authors permission, and without indication that the passages were
edited. In many of the cases described, the meaning of the passage is lost. The
types of changes
being made go beyond abridgement, which may be a necessary evil on
a timed exam. Mentions of race, religion, sex, and alcohol are cut, and in one
case the word "fat" was replaced with "heavy", to be more sensitive. The
people who are pushing these types of changes are taking what started
decades ago as a push to prevent openly racist, hostile texts from being used
in standardized tests and are trying to banish any slightly uncomfortable ideas.
Beyond the ridiculousness of the edits being made, the edited versions would seem to work against those students who had actually read the texts in question and have to choose between answering based on what the actual book says, and what the passage they are given says. If the literature in question is really unacceptable for "children" (as these high-school seniors are being labelled), then use passages that are acceptable. If existing literature is going to be torn apart in this way, then use the editing time to create original passages, which would have the tangential advantage of being equally novel to all of the students being tested.
Finally, to be an idealist for a moment, manipulating an author's work in this way
isn't intellectually honest, and with plagiarism running rampant through schools and
colleges, wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that the educational system
is setting the right example?
[via Arts & Letters Daily]
|
reading: |
||
|
6.13.2002 |
If you're exceptionally handy, or you've got an
exceptional amount of time on your hands, this guy shows you how to
make a
skyscape for your
window. His is very impressive, and the instructions are
quite details. I just wish he'd shown a picture of what the view
out the window looked like during the day.
[via #!/usr/bin/girl]
Though it's gotten some press, particularly in
techy circles, after a very negative review from a friend I decided
to pass on Wolfram's new book, A New Kind of Science. I
appreciated this review
of the book, though, which outlines the main arguments in what
seems to be a fair manner while still pointing out the book's significant
flaws, not the least of which, to me, is the observation that this
1200 page tome doesn't include a bibliography.
In my neverending quest to keep y'all up to date
on the absurdity in the world, I must point out the
Wal-Mart
Ham Trial in which a woman is claiming that a 13-pound ham
fell on her head in a Wal-Mart and caused her to develop epilepsy.
Wal-Mart responds: "The ham could not have struck Mrs. Vasquez, ...
Even in Wal-Mart, Isaac Newton's law of gravity still exists."
[via Bad Hair Days]
In more weblog clique-age Fairvue has updated
Blog.Elements,
the periodic table of weblogs, to eliminate expired weblogs and eliminate
the nonexistant element 118. I'm proud to maintain my place as
Chromium, the shiny fender of the weblog community.
|
![]() my poor neglected plant...
reading: |
||
|
6.7.2002 |
I can understand the emotions and logic which lead
people to try to outlaw
abortion. I can even see where the arguments against requiring
insurance companies to pay for birth control lie (so long as those insurance
companies are being consistent about which other drugs they will or won't
cover). But I absolutely cannot understand the position that
all
"artificial" birth control forms are abortifacient and
thus some
Kentucky counties are going to refuse federal family planning money
as it would tie those counties into having to make these forms of birth
control (most particularly chemical forms such as birth control pills) available.
Rather, the local Right-to-Life group is moving on to
trying to prevent these drugs from being given. At the least, they want
to prohibit funding to organizations through which birth control can be
obtained, even if the funding would not used to pay for that birth control.
Just in case anyone is confused here, if you want to reduce the number of abortions in this country, reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies would be a good first step. Taking away the most effective, and easiest to use, forms of birth control will increase unwanted pregnancies. What's left? Diaphrams - which are notoriously tricky to insert properly and ineffective if inserted improperly. Condoms - which also have some reliability issues and require the man's cooperation. If you want to hold women to a zero-tolerance policy on unwanted pregnancies, then you have to give women the power to prevent those pregnancies.
Oh right - there's also abstinance. Which is a very good option for
many groups of people (teenagers, I'm looking straight at you). But take
a look around our society and the amount of sex in our media and then tell
me that as a national solution to unwanted pregnancies, that's going to work
anytime in the near future. Hell - if the introduction of the AIDS risk into the
sexual scene didn't kill the problem, a moral argument from the government
in the midst of thousands of competing messages isn't going to. Those people
who want to build a society where sex is only acceptable for procreative
purposes are crossing way over the line of protecting societal good and are
trying to impose their own, almost certainly religiously based, morals on
everyone to the probable detriment of societal good.
[via News We Can Use]
|
reading: Girl with Curious Hair; David Foster Wallace Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies; Douglas Hofstadter |
||
|
6.6.2002 |
I hadn't realized how much different search
engines borrowed results from each other, but this
Search
Engine Relationship Chart (in PDF) shows that most of the
ones you've heard of, and some you haven't, are using or supplying
results to each other. Apparently, Yahoo uses Google's results,
and almost everyone uses results from Overture, which requires
sites to pay to be listed.
[via BookPeople]
I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, but when I receive an e-mail like the following, I have to assume that the writer is fishing for a homework assignment rather than actually showing interest: I've read your review on Wicked online, and I was wondering have you ever done a in depth character analysis on any of the characters in Wicked by Gregory Maguire? If you have, do you think you can send me a copy, because I am very interested in reading it. I found the novel very fascinating. Thank You.I mean, really - let's try to have a modicum of subtlety here. Though I suppose she should get points for soliciting an essay which isn't currently out on the internet and thus might be less detectable as plagairism. My unkind side wishes I had the time to write an inaccurate and poorly executed essay to send along.
Not much else today since I spent my surfing
time cleaning up my portal. All of the
dead links are now gone and I worked a few of my bookmarks in.
I also noticed that Google finally has my new domain name crawled
and I'm back to getting hits through them.
|
reading: |
||
|
6.5.2002 |
Yes, I certainly owe you all a
review of
Star Wars: Attack of the Clones after the aborted
theme-week attempt. In three words: I liked it. And, to close off
the Star Wars link-of-the-day theme, you can now buy your
own
custom made light saber
at this site
[via #!/usr/bin/girl].
Cool!
A nice little tool to make all of
the content in eBooks more accessible,
SearcheBooks
does basic searching over online eBooks.
And it's not just books that are getting put
on-line as they move into the public domain. The
Choral Public Domain Library
catalogs thousands of sheet music scores available free on-line.
Note, however, that not all of the music is truly in the public
domain; many, for example, are freely available for religious
use only.
[via BookPeople]
If you don't get their catalog allow me to point
out that Land's End women's tank tops
are currently on sale for $8. These are absolutely great tank tops, with
high enough arm holes and wide enough straps you can wear any bra
under them, and they're out of a really good cotton knit fabric that lasts
forever. I have two that are only just starting to wear out now after ten years.
Even at the $9 each that shipping and tax add on, this is a great price
for these and I'd recommend them to anyone.
In another reason to love Amazon, I was
shipped a DVD by them last week which, this week, was lowered
in price by $4. How do I know the price dropped? I just got e-mail
from them letting me know that they're crediting my credit card with
$4. Of course, one could also see this as a reason to dislike
Amazon since I'm sure they dropped their price to stay competative
with other stores and keep people from returning the movie and
buying it locally at a lower price. But from the selfish consumer
point of view, it was great.
|
reading: |
||
| Previous Entries |
|
These pages are Copyright 1999 -2002. Do not copy or redistribute any of the content on these pages without express permission. Direct any questions to maxsroom@gmail.com.