Portal
Archives
Background
Sites of the Week
Polls & Discussion

Get notified when I post;
sign up for my Update List

 My other sites:
Chained Links
Book Reviews

Screenshot

Weblogged by Amanda
maxsroom@gmail.com

tracking by Link Feedback
comments by YACCS

Update your bookmarks to Screenshot's new home: www.maxsroom.org/screenshot/

5.7.2002 The construction outside my office is barrelling ahead, with a couple of stories of structure raised already. On Friday, they laid another concrete floor, and after it was partially dry, they buffed the surface with these great riding-buffer machines. Wouldn't they make floor scrubbing way more fun? There were two guys out with the riding-buffers and I kept wanting them to have races or play chicken, but they were boring and just did their job.

Incidentally, if you recall that I was keeping a log of the construction, I've discontinued that project. It was primarily a way for me to experiment with Greymatter. But if you're an alum who was enjoying the occasional constuction updates, I'll still be sharing particularly interesting photos and tidbits here.

For the crafters in the audience, there's an interesting On-Line Digital Archive of Weaving Documents which has got a fairly extensive coolection of books about weaving and textiles availble in PDF format. It's a category of books that tends to be expensive and poorly represented in small local libraries. I particularly enjoyed skimming some of the old periodicals.

It's slightly old news, but last week a court ordered ReplayTV users' viewing choices be recorded for evidence in a case suing the company for contributing to copyright infringement. ReplayTV used to collect individual user data but stopped after it became clear users disliked the practice. Now, they're being forced to incorporate software to start tracking again. I'd certainly think twice about having one of these machines if I knew my viewing choices were being recorded, so I wonder if this will hurt their sales. I sort of hope it does; it would be a good statement to industry that consumers want a certain amount of privacy.

It seems that their trouble stems out of the machine's ability to not just skip commercials automatically but also the ability to send shows to other users. Cable stations are alleging that they are losing viewers because people are just viewing friends' copies of cable shows, which they claim is theft of the shows. I think Jen is absolutely right in her comments on this at Whim&Vinegar, sharing a cable show with a friend is actually good for the station, as it makes it more likely you'll sign up. They cannot make 100% of their viewers pay for it, unless they install surveillance cameras on cable boxes and only air the show if the people in the room have all paid. And it isn't as if VCRs killed cable television.

This reminds me of publishers being mad that Amazon is making it too easy to sell used books, losing sight of the fact that people who buy used books are people who buy more books, period. It's what the music industry is yelling about MP3s. These are all industries that are facing a loss in profits because a new technology is allowing users to access or use information in new ways. In some cases, these uses may constitue copyright infringement, but new technology should not be outlawed just because it hurts an industry's profits. These industries need to find ways to make profits within the context of these new technologies, that's probably going to mean figuring out what they can offer that users will be willing to pay for.


a happy picnic needs the right tools...

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (finished!)
England, England; Julian Barnes (very good)
Out of the Silent Planet; C.S. Lewis (too early to tell)

5.3.2002 I went to see Spider-man tonight and enjoyed it immensely. I would definitely recommend it! I've got a review of it up in a new section I'm creating for essays. I'm calling it a "review for the squeamish" because I've got a number of friends and relatives (myself included) who enjoy movies except those with gore/snakes/nuclear bombs/etc. and there are times we'd appreciate a review that would come out and tell me if I'll be able to stomach a film or not. Hence, a review for these people.... There are some spoilers at the bottom of the review, but I've marked them off clearly.

Some background on Steve Mann, the self proclaimed cyborg who was recently in the news for being hassled by airline security, in a recent Chronicle article. I knew he approached cyborg-ism with a strong personal agenda, but I didn't know he taught a grad level class in which students build their own wearable computers, though only some are wearing them around campus as Prof. Mann does. On the plus side, Mann is less oblivious of the social impact of his research than some scientists, drawing a distinction between the privacy issues of wearable cameras as compared to surveillance cameras, and coming down strongly against the surveillance cameras.

I have to listen to music while I work, and I prefer the radio so I don't have to make choices and get variety, but Ithaca radio stations, in general, suck. I don't know how it took me this long to realize that, with the internet, I'm not limited to Ithaca stations. Recently, I've been enjoying KMTT out of Seattle. Matream rock, but they'll actually play multiple songs in a row that I like! And, if the client is playing correctly, it actually displays the name and artist for the current song, which is very cool. Also cool that they blank out most ads and you get bland background music instead, until the broadcast comes back.

Have I mentioned recently that reading Medley makes you smarter, sexier, and more successful? Try it - it works!

I can't stand to fly
I'm not that naive
I'm just out to find
The better part of me

I'm more than a bird...I'm more than a plane
More than some pretty face beside a train
It's not easy to be me

Wish that I could cry
Fall upon my knees
Find a way to lie
About a home I'll never see

It may sound absurd...but don't be naive
Even Heroes have the right to bleed
I may be disturbed...but won't you concede
Even Heroes have the right to dream
It's not easy to be me
-- Superman, Five for Fighting

5.2.2002 Hey, loyal readers - favor to ask here! Google's still rating my old URL way higher than my new URL, I'm guessing because there are more links to the old location. If you've been kind enough to link me on your site, updating the link to "www.maxsroom.org/screenshot/" would just make my day. Thanks!

I think the most revealing quote on the Q&A section of Gillian Anderson's website is:

Chris is out here and in good spirits as well. Going for runs in the early evenings after work when the rest of us can barely peel ourselves off the couch. Where does he get his energy? I think he and David are working up to a triathlon in the next month or so which also includes biking and swimming. A safe way for them to compete.
And how can you not love her for saying one of her favorite memories was shooting the scene where Mulder shows Scully how to hit a baseball. That was a great scene; possibly my favorite Scully/Mulder scene of the series. Some of her other favorite moments are really funny. And it comes through pretty clearly that acting with David Duchovney was her favorite part of the job. [via Windowseat]

An impressive amatuer video of a light saber battle. Also amusing is Bunker Buster the Friendly Nuke. [via #!/usr/bin/girl]

I like to see the classic old games in arcades, even though I've never been very good at them. Certainly not good enough to, say, overflow the high score buffer on Galaga, like some people I know... It's not the same, but you can get a little practice in playing on-line at home. None of the high scores there break a million, though. [1295640 - You go J!]

CJ's being hunted! Cool! Ummm, because she's not real or anything. "No press secretaries were harmed in the making of this show", and all that....

I came across yet another comment about Amazon.com being evil today, where a weblogger was expressing shame at having ordered from them, and it was one of those camel's-back moments where I just became entirely sick of what seems to be an "evil Amazon" party line all good independent thinkers are supposed to adhere to. Actually, the original camel's-back moment was a couple of years ago when a party-goer at my house vandalized my Amazon magnet because "they are evil", particularly since the magnet had sentimental value (shut up...). But, I have been driven to rant again.

Amazon does not employ sweatshop labor or press small children into service. Amazon does not pour toxic chemicals into our water sources. Amazon does not test its products by torturing animals. Amazon does offer what many consider valuable and easy to use services. I have never walked into a book store and been able to get the same range of input on a book I was considering buying. You may choose not to shop there, but the amount of condemnation that one hears for admitting to buy from them is beyond what I've heard for almost any other company, and it's starting to piss me off.

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (democracy is unjust)

watching:
West Wing (finally!)
Survivor (predictable week)
CSI ("ripped from the internet" much?)

5.1.2002 I went to hear the editor of The Onion speak last night on campus (one of the things I still appreciate about being on a campus...). He wasn't a polished public speaker, nor a comedian as such, but was still entertaining. One got a sense of the Onion as still being a personal project for the writers, at that is really won't be the same with staff turnover or different writers. I'm more sympathetic to their poorer weeks now. And, no surprise, he confirmed that there are people out there who think their articles are real and send in angry or horrified e-mail.

Suprisingly amusing: vote for What's Better?. Pick the prefered of two random photos - by whatever definition of "better" you like. They use the stats to rate all their items. Over the past day Darth Vader has been moving steadily up the top ten - rightly so! "Calvin and Hobbes" versus "Hydroelectric Power" - how to choose...

Instead of waiting for AdCritic to come back, you can just head over to ads.com to look up your favorite ads.Doesn't offer the "top 10 ads" feature that AdCritic had, but you can view a list of ads which viewed during a particular TV show (only running for a couple of shows). [via BradLands]

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (less than 100 pages to go)

watching:
not 24 (*pout*)

4.25.2002 I'm trying to read Plato's Republic right now. It's typical Socratic method stuff - he's trying to define justice and determine whether just men are happier than unjust men. After the first chapter, he doesn't have someone to debate against, but there is a character that he lays out his argument to and asks to verify his thinking along each step of the way. Perhaps because in other Plato I've read, this technique is usually used for Socrates to trap his opponent into a contradiction and thus prove him wrong, I keep expecting Socrates to lead up to a point where you realize everything he's laid out about the perfect just society is wrong and in reality should be the opposite. This feeling is exacerbated by the fact that his perfect just society includes separating babies from their parents and raising them communally so each is raised for the career they are most suited for, and for those babies which the parents were not given permission to have to be "disposed of" since they will not be in the interest of the perfect society. Additionally, he advocates extreme governmental control over all writing and art produced to ensure that it encourages only thinking which is advantageous to a just society. On the plus side, he does say women should be able to hold all of the same jobs as men, so perhaps I shouldn't cast his other ideas aside so lightly...

I'm still not entirely convinced that he won't lead up to a twist and it's all a joke that he's seeing how extreme a view he can get his partner to agree to. I certainly get pretty aggrivated about how easily this guy agrees that something must necessarily be true, when absolutely no argument to that effect has been given, and the point is in fact not obvious at all. So, I'm sticking through it to see where it all ends up.

Someone tell me this isn't for real! I know there are anti-evolution Christians who believe that evloution and other "secular humanism" is being made into a national religion and must be stopped, but the level of paranoia in this article unearthing evolution propaganda in a variety of venues is so extreme, I couldn't help but laugh. The biggest target is Apple (oooo - apples=temptation=evil!) and the Macintosh computer:

However, these propagandists aren't just targeting the young. Take for example Apple Computers, makers of the popular Macintosh line of computers. The real operating system hiding under the newest version of the Macintosh operating system (MacOS X) is called... Darwin! That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! While they currently don't advertise this fact to consumers, it is well known among the computer elite, who are mostly Atheists and Pagans. Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism. They try to hide all of this under a facade of shiny, "lickable" buttons, but the truth has finally come out: Apple Computers promote Godless Darwinism and Communism.
I also liked the part where he warned poor unknowing Christian Mac users that their computers have demons on them, which is clearly a Bad Thing. I mean, that's the punchline to an ancient usenet/UNIX joke - this can't be real! At least they add the new twist of horror over needing the "secret code" of "chmod 666" to unlock files. Horrors, indeed!

For more ill-spirited amusement at these people's expense, check out their Mall Mission article, in which we learn that malls are the temple of the forces of secularism, get more analysis of the subliminal messages store names are sending us, and get pointers on being a "mall missionary". Last minute male shoppers are particularly good targets, as renouncing consumerism and a quick trip back to the church for an "emergency baptism" is a lot easier than buying gifts. [via Mood Swings]

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (past the halfway point)

4.24.2002 An orsine mathematical savant has made its appearance on the internet: The Prime Number Shitting Bear. I originally saw this linked via Rebecca's Pocket as the more child-friendly Prime Number Pooping Bear, but the polite version doesn't actually produce any prime numbers. If you're really patient, and are willing to devote enough cycles, you can get on the top ten list of people who've seen the bear shit the largest prime numbers. Sometimes it's good to set attainable goals for oneself...

If you're wondering what the people who are already lined up to see Episode II are thinking (and if you're asking "episode 2 of what, just skip on by...), there's a group of people who lined up for Episode I who are out there again and have put up a website about the experience. Even more, they list the number of the pay phone at the line, so you can give them a call and chat. I won't admit how many seconds I spent considering it.

In an unusual way to use word frequency analysis, the TextArc project gives a visual representation of a text using a graph of word adjacencies. They claim their presentation "uses the viewer's eye to help uncover meaning", by making word associations explicit and highlighting frequent words. The ability to see all of the lines in a text which use a particular word has obvious uses, and certainly patterns of which words flow in and out of frequent use during the progression of a text reflects the text's meaning. The presentation in question, though, does not seem particularly revealing. It is overcrowded, so patterns aren't visible. I can't readily think of a question or problem which is most easily approached through this representation. [via Larkfarm]


sprouting seedlings; assorted flowering annuals

reading:
too little

4.23.2002 I've got two new book reviews posted today, both for books I rated a '+'. The first is for Simon Singh's The Code Book, a survey of code writing and code breaking. The second is for Italo Calvino's collection of short stories, Difficult Loves. If I keep reading as slowly as I am this year, and continue to review at least one book a week, I might actually get caught up, for this year at least. I'm pretty much only getting time in to read right before bed anymore.

I was sure I misheard the radio when it announced we could vote for the Home Depot Humanitarian Award online. After all, I hadn't had my coffee yet, and I wasn't really paying attention. Except, the Home Depot site really is asking you to vote in the Home Depot Humanitarian Award. The cognitive dissonance fades when you get to the tag line: "Recognizing Country Music Artists for Community Service and Generosity". It's a advertisting tie in with the Academy of Country Music Awards, since they'll announce the winner then. I'm considerably less confused now.

Nothing is better than geeky crafts. Does anyone out there want a Periodic Table Sweater? [via Breaching the Web] The same page also lists a "Tetris Baby Blanket" if you scroll down a little. Both are knit patterns. While the pattern isn't given, you can also go check out the Double Helix Cable Pattern on the cover of a recent edition of nature genetics; it looks like a proficient knitter would be able to reason out the stitches. [via Dangerous Chunky]

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (haven't quite achieved justice)

Previous Entries

 

 

Subsequent
Entries

These pages are Copyright 1999 -2002. Do not copy or redistribute any of the content on these pages without express permission. Direct any questions to maxsroom@gmail.com.