Portal
Archives
Background
Sites of the Week
Polls & Discussion

Get notified when I post;
sign up for my Update List

 My other sites:
Chained Links
Book Reviews

Screenshot

Weblogged by Amanda
maxsroom@gmail.com

tracking by Link Feedback
comments by YACCS

Update your bookmarks to Screenshot's new home: www.maxsroom.org/screenshot/

4.22.2002 For the past many, many years, my inbox has had at least 150 messages in it, usually over 200. This is due in part to my only filtering off "discussion" mailing lists which are easier to follow if there are in their own directory, but allowing publication-style mailing lists (like Agre's RRE) to pile up in my inbox. I finally went through last week and deleted everything I hadn't read yet, admitting that so much new content comes in every day that I'm never going to go back and read messages from a year ago. I've also emptied the subfolders for mailing lists, leaving me with under 30 to-handle e-mail messages, period. I'm surprised that I get the same psychological boost from cleaning up my e-mail as I do from cleaning my physical surroundings.

According to the Which storybook character are you? quiz, I'm Harry Potter. Woooo! Now if only she'd hurry up with that next book! [via PCJM]

And if you're a quiz fan, the new-to-me blog clarablog had links to oodles of them recently, including what type of movie character would you be, what dictator are you, what lego character are you, and which Star Wars prequel character are you.

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (still working through it)

playing:
chess

bitching about:
snow (still?)
X-Files (still!)

4.21.2002 I think tonight Chris Carter was telling us that sometimes people and things that we care about very much, but if they are lost to a greater good that has been the purpose of their existence, it is a noble thing, though still sad.

Or, Chris Carter was telling us that we've been bad little fans and won't be getting and Lone Gunmen in our movies.

Let me tell you something, Chris - I'm really sorry that your show's been getting awful ratings the past year. Honestly, your writing was floundering even before Duchovney left. But not-so-subtly telling your fans to get over it (and, yes, I'm also thinking of last week's episode here) is rude and self-defeating. Even if your scripts had remained as scintilating as ever, people don't watch television for the writing alone. There are other artistic media to which people turn when well-crafted writing is their only interest. In the performance arts, the quality with which your words are conveyed also wins and loses fans. Since this loyalty to the actors on your shows, rather than to your words alone, obviously hurts you, perhaps you ought to return to your auspicious career as a novelist.

Oh... right.... you didn't have one. Then perhaps you ought to be grateful that you had an incredibly popular television show which suceed despite doubts that a sci-fi show of its type could ever had broad popularity and which garnered a rabidly enthusiastic fan base and much critical praise. If it's taken you longer to see that the ride was over, your fans will accept that you were too close to it to notice, but turning on them will only bitter their memories.

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (plodding)

watching:
X-Files - of course....
Nurse Betty - not as funny as hyped to be

4.16.2002 I've posted another book review, this one for The Professor and the Madman by Simon Winchester. It's about an inmate at an insane asylum who submitted many of the quotes used in the Oxford English Dictionary. I gave it a reserved '+' for an interesting story but less focus on the dictionary than I would have liked.

A friend and I were listening to the audio CD that comes with the special edition DVD of Almost Famous, and after many times through the track "Hour of Need", we still can't figure out the repeated line which closes off each verse. We're torn between whether it says "Riding a horse drowned in the sea", or "Writhing and hoarse, drowned in the sea". Neither actually make that much sense as what he won't be able to escape his demons until he does. Anyone know? If you don't already have this DVD, I'd recommend you get it anyway, and the director's cut isvery good, and if you can figure out those lyrics for me, hey, that's a plus too!

For my latest Java game obsession,I am absolutely hooked on HangARoo. It's hangman, but with an obnoxious kangeroo whose life is at stake. Rather than just words, there are phrases, book and song titles, television characters, and other trivia stuff to guess. If you can guess ten phrases without hanging your roo, you win. I tend to hang my roo on the "Oscar Winner" category. [via #!/usr/bin/girl]

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (plodding)

watching:
24 (still loving it)
X-Files (Chris Carter needs to chill)

planting:
basil, thyme, oregano, chives, marjoram
assorted flowering annuals

playing:
tennis (woo! warm weather!)

4.10.2002 Internet enthusiasts, particularly those who feel their online experiences are as real as their real life experiences ought to read over this review of On the Internet: Thinking in Action by Hubert Dreyfus, if not read the book itself. Dreyfus, a philosopher writing about technology, claims that experiences separated from the body are by necessity less valuable, particularly as risk and responsibility are absent. In fact, internet life is detrimental to one's well being. Distance education through the internet is particularly criticized as in conflict with the process of learning. The review concludes:
Drawing on a diverse array of thinkers, he draws parallels between the Internet and the birth of a media-obsessed public in the 18th century and the Enlightenment quest for a universal, abstract knowledge. He shows how the Internet ignores essential human capacities such as trust, moods, risk, shared local concerns and commitment. He also uses compelling examples from the experience of teaching to show what "interactive" education leaves out.
I haven't read the book in question, so I can't argue against it, but I suspect I would not agree with him in the end, though in the very limited example of distance learning, I think there are advantages to personal contact that should not be ignored. In the forum linked at the end of the article, there's a nice post pointing out a similar argument warning against the ills of teaching through printed books from the 15th century. [via Tomorrow's Professor]

In probably the coolest on-line reference I've run across recently, Project Gutenberg has put on-line the full text of all State of the Union addresses including this year's address (note: huge text file, you can get the 3.2M zip file here instead). I haven't had a chance to look over the speeches yet, but I'm planning on saving the file so I can do so later.

Authors and publishers are decrying Amazon for selling used books along side new copies of the same book on their site, saying that this is undercutting sales of the new books and hurting them while profiting Amazon. Says the article:

[They] were particularly upset that Amazon was offering used books for sale at the same time as the books' original publication. That suggested that free copies sent to potential reviewers were turning up for sale as used books at Amazon.com, usually for a small fraction of the retail price. Selling review copies as used books was previously limited to stores in New York and other media centers.)

"We asked could we at least talk about when something could become available as a used book? Could we maybe wait three months after the book was published?" said Patricia Schroeder, president of the Association of American Publishers. "The biggest problem is that it is legal, I think. I wring my hands, pound my desk and say, `Aargh.' "

As a buyer, one should be aware that none of the cost of a used book goes to the author. However, as a buyer, it is useful for Amazon to list all of the copies of a book, used or not, which they know are available. While it is less common, there are bookstores which shelve used and new books intermingled on the same shelves, particularly in the case of expensive textbooks. Used book stores are common. If buyers don't feel there is enough advantage to owning a new book to justify the higher price, I have no problem with Amazon helping them find used copies to buy instead. It seems that it has to be to the advantage to the publishing industry as a whole for people to be reading; in my experience, people who buy used books are people who buy books in general. [via Project Gutenberg]

reading:
The Republic of Plato; Plato (this works under a weird standard of logic)

watching:
West Wing (rerun, from back when the writing was good, *sigh*)

playing:
catch in the park

4.9.2002 The seemingly increasing practice of famous people being listed as the author of a book they didn't write raises some questions about the ethics of using and crediting ghostwriters. This article points out that ghostwriters' names are often omitted from book covers entirely, sometimes only credited in acknowledgements at the end of the book, and decries the practice as on par with plagiarism and false advertising. I agree that it is dishonest of publishers to list as sole author an individual who did not actually write the book in question. But I suspect the authors get more out of this practice than is suggested by this article. Crediting a book to a famous author will result in more sales, and more chances to collect reviews, thus building up their credibility within the publishing community, even if not with the public at large. [via Arts & Letters Daily]

More LEGO fun with this immense LEGO church. This amazing structure seats over 1000 minifigs. makes really nice use of clear panels and light, and is very details. I love the pipe organ. Be sure to take the entire photo tour. [via Whim&Vinegar]

While it doesn't offer much new to those who've been having the "what is science fiction" debate for years, this is nice little discussion of the question by a physicist and sci-fi writer who falls in the "hard science fiction" camp and asserts that there is science fiction with good science and good writing being produced, and closes with a list of authors he recommends. [via Arts & Letters Daily]

The 80's cult classic Real Genius is finally coming out on DVD this June. A great film about geeks in which intelligence is actually a positive, and some geeks are cute, funny, cool people. Just ignore the inexplicable scene with beauticians in bikinis.

The unintentional political commentary can be the most amusing. I had the TV on in the background last night, and was half listening to Ashleigh Bansfield interview an IDF captain when my attention was caught by the theme song to the Flintstones - playing on someone's cell phone. Once is an accident, but I couldn't help laughing when the caller rang back while the interview was still on the air.

And wasn't it sweet for someone to call into my local radio station to dedicate John Mellencamp's "Peaceful World" to Colin Powell?

reading:
Difficult Loves; Italo Calvino (good)
The Republic of Plato; Plato (still judging...)

watching:
24 (still good)
ST:TNG:Encounter at Farpoint (fun, love the old episodes)

4.4.2002 As I noted in yesterday's sidebar I saw Michael Moore on his book tour yesterday, and he's a funny guy but he's also got some problems with factual accuracy and the application of logic that make him less of a serious commentator and more of an entertaining cheerleader for liberal activists (which, hey, I can get behind....) But I'm amused to no end to be living in a town which out-liberals Moore - most of the questions to him were about what type of shoes he was wearing (he assured us the "N" was for "New Balance", not "Nike"), how he spent his money, and a bitter attack for not going with an independent publisher. It's reminiscent of Lileks' recent comments on Moore's book tour diary, though the Ithaca audience was earnest and hoping to rally behind him. Lileks does a nice job pointing out some of the ways in which Moore's a nut. And perhaps some of the Ithaca locals were critical because they'd read this quote of Moore's:
You know in my town the small businesses that everyone wanted to protect? They were the people that supported all the right-wing groups. They were the Republicans in the town, they were in the Kiwanas, the Chamber of Commerce - people that kept the town all white. The small hardware salesman, the small clothing store salespersons, Jesse the Barber who signed his name three different times on three different petitions to recall me from the school board. Fuck all these small businesses - fuck 'em all! Bring in the chains. The small businesspeople are the rednecks that run the town and suppress the people. Fuck 'em all. That's how I feel.
But really, the best line in the article is one of Lileks' in response to Moore saying he's making a documentary about the situation with the trees:
"God help me should I ever find myself at a political meeting where someone worries about `the situation with the trees' and everyone knows what he means."
Indeed.

Chemical company Dow announced today that it will be using using microbes to clean up contaminated groundwater, as an effective and cheaper way to meet its environmental obligations. While laws are clearly necessary to compell companies to clean up after themselves, by developing these cheaper methods, companies will choose to comply because the clean up will finally be less expensive than the fines for not doing so - their fine for not building a $100 million water treatment facility was only $200,000. [via Sigma Xi: Science in the News]

I can't resist a good web game and lately I've been playing The Rockstar Game. This isn't a Java or Flash video game, the goal here is to manage your money and your time (represented by points) between practicing your craft, writing songs, and going on tour until you become a rock star. And other people are trying to beat you on the charts at the same time. The twist that takes this beyond "Lemonade Stand" on the Apple IIe? You only get 7 points every three hours. It's long enough between increases that you can't spend all day sitting at the site waiting (good for us obsessive types). But when you wake up in the morning, you've accumulated enough overnight to go on a whirlwind tour, or a song writing spree. Not for everybody, but I'm having fun. [via Bad Hair Days]


Ithaca's version of "April showers"

reading:
Difficult Loves; Italo Calvino (okay)
The Republic of Plato; Plato (just starting)

4.3.2002 Another week, another book review. At least, that's the goal. This week I bring you What Johnny Shouldn't Read: Textbook Censorship in America by Joan Delfattore, a '+' rated book about the legal issues surrounding textbook challenges in the US. I enjoyed it thoroughly and felt I learned something; it would particularly appeal to people who wished they had the time and expertise to keep up on interesting court rulings, since it does have a strong legal basis.

A federal housing law mandating the eviction of families of which any member is arrested for drug or violent crimes is being applied to evict women after they report acts of domestic violence against themselves. Clearly, this is not the point of the law. Furthermore, it would seem that most any case in which a family member reported the crime in question would be cause to overturn the eviction. The article is unfortunately vague about whether eviction is required, or, as it is implied early in the article, an eviction hearing is required. If the later, one would hope that housing authorities would choose not to evict in this type of case. Sadly, it sounds as if they are evicting some of these women... though, again unfortunately, this article is woefully lacking in details as how frequently this law is being badly applied. [via News We Can Use]

With the weather getting warmer, it's a good time for cool astronomy events, such as the five naked eye planets coming together in a clump. The article reassures us:

A similar grouping of the same five planets, plus the moon, occurred on May 5, 2000, accompanied by dire predictions of extraordinary tides and other cataclysms. Earth survived.
[via Sigma Xi: Science in the News]

reading:
Difficult Loves; Italo Calvino (okay)
poetry; John Donne (eh)

attending:
Michael Moore book tour lecture (fun)

watching:
West Wing (liking Hoynes)
24 (hating Kim)

Previous Entries

 

 

Subsequent
Entries

These pages are Copyright 1999 -2002. Do not copy or redistribute any of the content on these pages without express permission. Direct any questions to maxsroom@gmail.com.